Featured Posts

Andaman Dive Sites - Hin Daeng & Hin MuangAndaman Dive Sites - Hin Daeng & Hin Muang Two of the more popular dive sites in Thailand, Hin Daeng & Hin Muang are usually dived on the same day due to their close proximity to each other. In fact they are so close you can swim from one to...

Readmore

New Scuba Diving Holidays to ThailandNew Scuba Diving Holidays to Thailand Scuba diving holidays to Thailand will never be the same from the end of 2008, that's the dream anyway. The Thai Dive Association (TDA) is ready to start phase 2 in what has been called project 'Coral...

Readmore

Best Time To Dive In ThailandBest Time To Dive In Thailand With Thailand offered as an all year round holiday destination, I thought it would be best to point out that although you can pretty much dive all year round this is not possable or practical at the same...

Readmore

Learn To Scuba Dive - Part 1Learn To Scuba Dive - Part 1 Just in case you didn't know, scuba diving can be dangerous sport. The equipment used needs to be handled properly and as of today, we humans still can't breath underwater without this equipment! So, before...

Readmore

  • Prev
  • Next

PM Samak forced to step down

Posted on : 10-09-2008 | By : Brian | In : Thailand News

Tags:

0

After a long protest and some not so pretty clashes with the police the people of Thailand have what it seems they wanted maybe not in the way they wanted but I’m sure they are just happy that they have won.

Bangkok (The Nation): Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej has lost his post and his cabinet will function as a caretaker cabinet following this afternoon’s Constitution Court verdict that the PM is guilty of violating the nation‘s charter.

Six judges considered Samak to be the “employee” while three others considered him a “business partner” of a TV studio, a constitutional offence in both cases.

The court said evidence presented by Samak that he was only given transport fees for hosting the show “contradicted” payment evidence by the studio, Face Media.

The court went strong on the principles laid down by the Constitution against conflicts of interest. The judges pointed out that Samak’s defense, using definitions of “employ”, “employer” and “employee” from different laws, was not enough to determine whether the will of the Constitution had been violated. (src)